Columbia University Settles $9 Million Lawsuit Over Alleged False Rankings

Case Overview: Columbia University has agreed to a $9 million settlement to resolve claims that it submitted false data to manipulate its U.S. News college rankings, allegedly misleading prospective students and leading to overcharged tuition.

Consumers Affected: Approximately 22,000 undergraduate students who attended Columbia College, Columbia Engineering, and the School of General Studies between fall 2016 and spring 2022.

Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Students who paid premium tuition based on Columbia University's inflated U.S. News rankings will receive $9 million under a settlement agreement announced this week.

The Ivy League institution agreed to the payout after facing allegations that it submitted false data to manipulate its position in the influential college rankings, misleading prospective students about the quality of education they would receive.

According to Reuters, the preliminary settlement filed Monday in Manhattan federal court covers approximately 22,000 undergraduate students who attended Columbia College, Columbia Engineering, and the School of General Studies between fall 2016 and spring 2022.

Students Alleged Systematic Data Manipulation for Rankings Boost

Students claimed Columbia artificially inflated its U.S. News ranking by consistently reporting inaccurate information about class sizes, faculty resources, and other metrics used in the publication's methodology.

The lawsuit alleged that Columbia falsely reported that 83% of its classes had fewer than 20 students, a statistic that significantly boosted the university's ranking position.

These misrepresentations helped Columbia achieve a No. 2 ranking among undergraduate institutions in 2022, making it appear more selective and academically rigorous than competing schools.

According to the complaint, students relied on these inflated rankings when making enrollment decisions and paying tuition fees that reflected Columbia's perceived elite status.

"The misrepresentations enticed them to enroll and allowed Columbia to overcharge them on tuition," the settlement documents state.

Professor's Analysis Exposed Ranking Discrepancies

The controversy erupted in July 2022 when Columbia mathematics professor Michael Thaddeus published a detailed report questioning the accuracy of data underlying the university's No. 2 ranking.

Thaddeus analyzed the statistical information Columbia submitted to U.S. News and found numerous discrepancies between reported figures and actual university operations. His research revealed that class size data, faculty-to-student ratios, and other metrics appeared to be systematically inflated to improve Columbia's ranking position.

Following publication of the professor's findings, Columbia's ranking dropped dramatically to No. 18 in September 2022, reflecting more accurate data submissions.

University Admits Deficiencies While Denying Intentional Wrongdoing

Columbia denied wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement but acknowledged problems with its previous data reporting practices.

The university issued a statement saying it "deeply regrets deficiencies in prior reporting" and has implemented new oversight measures.

Columbia now provides prospective students with data reviewed by an independent advisory firm to ensure accuracy and transparency in educational information. The institution maintains that ranking manipulation was not intentional, characterizing the issues as reporting errors rather than deliberate deception.

Columbia Withdraws from U.S. News Rankings System

In June 2023, Columbia announced its undergraduate schools would stop participating in U.S. News rankings entirely.

The university criticized the rankings system for having "outsized influence" with prospective students and distorting educational priorities. Columbia stated that "much is lost" when educational quality gets reduced to numerical data points and statistical comparisons.

Several other prestigious institutions, including Harvard and Yale, have also withdrawn from U.S. News rankings for various programs, citing similar concerns about the system's methodology and impact.

Lawyers representing the Columbia student plaintiffs called the settlement "fair, reasonable and adequate" for addressing the harm caused by ranking manipulation. The legal team plans to seek up to one-third of the $9 million settlement for attorney fees, leaving approximately $6 million available for direct student compensation.

Individual payment amounts will depend on factors such as enrollment period, tuition paid, and degree program attended during the relevant timeframe. Students won't need to take additional steps to receive compensation once a federal judge grants final approval to the settlement agreement.

College Rankings Industry Faces Growing Skepticism

The Columbia case reflects mounting criticism of college ranking systems and their influence on higher education decisions. Educational institutions increasingly question whether rankings accurately measure teaching quality, student outcomes, and academic value.

Reuters reports that multiple universities have expressed concerns about ranking methodologies that may incentivize data manipulation over genuine educational improvements.

Consumer advocates argue that students deserve accurate information when making expensive educational investments that can affect their financial futures for decades.

The Columbia settlement establishes precedent for holding universities accountable when ranking-related misrepresentations harm students financially, potentially encouraging greater transparency across higher education.

Case Details

• Lawsuit: In Re: Columbia College Rankings Action
• Case Number: 22-05945
• Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Did Columbia University's U.S. News ranking influence your enrollment decision? Share your thoughts on this settlement below